Doctrine: Cross

March 25, 2013 — Leave a comment

ch-8-cross_0

Though not originally scheduled, because I was in town we had Doctrine class last night. What I went through in PowerPoint form was adapted from a PDF I made last year called The Person and Work of Christ. That itself was a condensed and rearranged form of Robert Peterson’s book Salvation Accomplished by The Son: The Work of Christ. I would recommend that book to everyone, but since many people do not have the patience for a 600 page book, I made the shortened PDF to guide you through the passages that Peterson exegetes.

In addition, you might find my series on the atonement from a few years ago good reading during holy week:

Though part of my larger review series on N. T. Wright’s Christian Origins and The Question of God, this post on The Story of Easter makes for good stand alone reading. A few other books that I’d recommend on the subject are:

That should be enough to keep you busy. This week isn’t really about reading, but reading is very useful this week as it moves you to reflect on the cross and resurrection and moves you to worship.

9781581346619

When I was in seminary, we used Bruce Demarest’s The Cross and Salvation as our textbook in soteriology. That was my introduction to the Foundations of Evangelical Theology series, and I liked it so much I picked up another volume, To Know and Love God, which proved very useful for theological method.

When I was reading through Gregg Allison’s Historical Theology about 18 months ago, I noticed in a footnote that he had a forthcoming book on the church in the series, and from then I eagerly awaited its publication (because I’m nerdy like that). I was able to get a review copy of it, and so here we are.

Overview

The intention of the Foundations of Evangelical Theology series is “to address all areas of evangelical theology with a special emphasis on key issues in each area” and “to incorporate insights from Scripture, historical theology, philosophy, etc., in order to produce an up-to-date work in systematic theology.” (17) Most of the writers are thoroughly evangelical in their theology and from a broadly Reformed perspective. The series aims to be “understandable to the beginner in theology as well as to the academic theologian,” so the authors take care “to define whatever technical terms they use.” (17)

With that in mind, Gregg Allison is offering a textbook on ecclesiology which is evangelical and broadly Reformed. Allison teaches at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, so it’s a Reformed baptist perspective. He is an elder at Sojourn Community Church, and if you’re familiar with that church/church planting network, that means this is an ecclesiology from a Reformed Baptist perspective that is in favor of multi-site churches (which he provides a defense for at the end of chapter 9).

The book itself is split into 7 parts:

  • Foundational Issues
  • The Biblical Vision – Characteristics of The Church
  • The Vision Actualized – The Growth of The Church
  • The Government of The Church
  • The Ordinances of The Church
  • The Ministries of The Church
  • Conclusion

The opening two chapters cover first, a general introduction to the study of the doctrine of the church, and second the basis of the church in the new covenant. Allison explains his method, and makes a good case that this is an important doctrine. Just as a side note, it is a doctrine that one of my profs at Dallas said was perhaps the most vital doctrine for the contemporary evangelical church to recover. We tend to either overlook or simply ignore studying ecclesiology, and Allison’s book aims to fix that issue.

The second part of the book turns to the characteristics of the church, or we could say the marks of a true church. Allison splits his marks into those related to the origin and orientation of the church (chapter 3) and those regarding the gathering and sending of the church (chapter 4). The resulting list is as follows:

  • Doxological (3)
  • Logocentric (3)
  • Pneumadynamic (3)
  • Covenantal (4)
  • Confessional (4)
  • Missional (4)
  • Spatio-temporal/Eschatological (4)

By “doxological,” Allison highlights the orientation of the church towards worship. By “logocentric,” Allison means the church is both Jesus centered and Scripture centered. “Pneumadynamic” fills out the trio of adjectives from chapter 3 and refers to the Spirit’s animating presence within the gathered body of believers. When it comes to chapter 4, I think you probably get the gist of what the first three adjectives mean (covenantal, confessional, missional) but spatio-temporal/eschatology might be a bit opaque. By it, Allison means that the church is an assembled historical reality (spatio-temporal) that has a future looking hope that affects how it functions in the here and now (eschatological).

With the vision in place, Allison continues on the growth of the church. His first chapter is on the purity and unity of the church. Here Allison draws a clear line between true and false churches, but allows for flexibility within true churches for them to be more or less pure in the faithfulness to the biblical vision. Chapter 6 finishes out this section with a discussion of the nature and significance of church discipline.

This provides a good segue to part 4 which concerns the government of the church. Allison begins with the offices of the church (chapter 7), before looking at the different types of church government (chapter 8). It is at this point that I think denominational concerns start to play a more significant role. Up to here, I think most denominations would agree with Allison’s articulation of the biblical vision for what the church is. But, starting with discussion of the offices, and then moving to government, we get into territory where Allison must start presenting and assessing different view points and come down on a specific position.

When it comes to church government, Allison presents three models: episcopalianism, presbyterianism, and congregationalism. For each, Allison gives a description, biblical and theological support, and misapprehensions and misgivings. In the following chapter (9), Allison presents his own model, which draws lessons from episcopalianism and presbyterianism, and integrates them into a semi-congregational model. The result is a plural-elder-led congregational model that sustains strong connections to other such churches. It is within this context that Allison provides his excursus on multi-site churches, arguing in favor of them.

This brings the reader to part 5, which has a chapter on baptism (10) and communion (11). Allison argues in favor for a believer’s baptist position in 10, but not without giving a sustained consideration to the arguments for paedobaptism. He also provides a brief history of the development of baptismal theology and practice. When it comes to the Lord’s Supper, Allison offers a similar treatment; first covering the historical development and then the five principal views. He finishes with his own perspective and theology of the Supper.

The final two sections are a chapter each. First, Allison surveys the ministries of the local church through the perspective of the spiritual gifts. His principle ministries or activities are as follows:

  • The Church Worships the Triune God
  • The Church Proclaims the Word of God
  • The Church Engages Non-Christians With the Gospel
  • The Church Disciples Its Members
  • The Church Cares for People
  • The Church is for and against the World

The final point is to underscore that the church is to be in the world but not of it. While Allison doesn’t offer a full-blown discussion of the relationship between church and culture, he does touch on it with this last point. The book is then brought to a conclusion with a final section and chapter.

Conclusion

Overall, I found Allison’s book to be very helpful. It is a strong contribution to the Foundations of Evangelical Theology series, and a well grounded work on ecclesiology that is sensitive to current practice and historical precedence. For a doctrine that is somewhat neglected, and in some cases very contentious, Allison’s work provides an accessible textbook for beginning to intermediate study. Reformed Baptists will find Allison’s work most helpful, but other evangelicals of different denominations should also benefit from Allison’s even-handed discussion. His arguments for multi-site church, as well as his treatment of baptism are worthy of critical interaction. If you are a pastor or church planter, this book definitely belongs on your shelf, and even if you’re not, it’s a great addition to a growing theological library!

Book Details

Purchase Info

Buy through Amazon to support Marturo!

Maybe the title is a little overstated, but if you keep reading I will give an accurate synopsis of every Rob Bell book ever (past, present, and future). Not to overgeneralize, nor to stereotype Bell, but he is pretty predictable. And if he is faithfully living up to the predictions of wiser observers, it is possible that those wise observers might pick up on others like him in our midst.

A couple of days ago, one of my profs from Dallas tweeted this:

He is commenting of course on the trajectory of Bell’s theology and public representation of the Christian faith in light his recent “coming out” in support of gay marriage. Certainly no one was surprised by the announcement, and if they were, they just haven’t been paying attention. If you were, I’ve got some amazing business opportunities you could invest in for me.

Two years ago, Bell’s farewell to conservative evangelical Christianity, a movement he was always on the fringe of anyway, came in the form of Love Wins, a blog post expanded into book form (much like his previous offering Drops Like Stars). I have it, but never got around to reading it (beyond the first chapter, which I commented on here), but I said that’s what I’d do anyway. I also said video trailers deserve the proper response, something the folks at Canon Wired took to heart and did just that.

Initially, when Bell made this shift, I thought we should distinguish between false teachers and false teaching. But, I conceded that Bell more or less was becoming the zeitgeist’s new prophet. Whatever the spirit of the American cultural age is into, there you will find Rob Bell. Since every else is coming out for gay marriage, Bell’s publicist knew it was time to do the same. In true Bibfeldtian spirit, Bell is here to affirm the culture at large in whatever they find near and dear at the moment.

Now, what Dr. Svigel is getting at is that the trajectory that led here is discernible farther back in time. Velvet Elvis came out around 8 years ago, and before that there was Sex God. My assessment of Velvet Elvis (a book I read in seminary) was that some false teaching never gets old, but there were some things that needed to be said. In essence, that is how every single Rob Bell book could be summarized: an engaging combination of valuable insights and bad theology.

Based on the trailer, and some reviews, that seems to be applicable to What We Talk About When We Talk About God. I’m debating whether to go to Barnes and Noble and read it while standing next to the bookshelf. With spring break coming up, anything could happen.

In the meantime, I think we should all take to heart Svigel’s quote. If anything, Bell’s coming out vindicated what thoughtful critics have been saying about Bell for years. He was clearly open to reinventing doctrine to suit the spirit of the age. In a time when we need men with chests to stand up for sound doctrine, we have another hipster without a spine. Bell is slowly going the way of the buffalo, but the writing has been on the wall for years.

Or actually, the writing has been on pages surrounding by white space and accompanied by glossy photos and engaging storytelling. For people with discernment, there’s probably writing on the walls of other pastor/teacher’s books right now as we speak/type. I don’t think we need to go on a heresy hunt, but I think we should pray we have eyes to see and ears to hear and not be afraid to concede that for some of us, our favorite author/pastor/teacher might be the next Rob Bell. He certainly wasn’t the first, and he definitely won’t be the last.

9780801048708

What does it mean to be a Calvinist? Was Calvin even a Calvinist? Does being Reformed mean you follow every jot and tittle in Calvin’s writings? Did Calvin actually teach TULIP?

These are some of the questions that underlie the essays in Richard Muller’s Calvin and The Reformed Tradition: On The Work of Christ and The Order of Salvation. The opening chapter a method for studying the Reformed tradition in the early modern era before Muller turns to a perennial question: Was Calvin a Calvinist? The answer is surprisingly complicated since it hinges on what you mean by “Calvinism.” If Calvinism is Calvin’s own position, then of course he was, but then no one else is because no one uncritically follows everything Calvin taught. If Calvinism is the system put together by his followers, then Calvin can’t be one since it post-dates his own thought. If Calvinism is another way of saying “the Reformed tradition in general,” then additional problems emerge since Calvin was not considered the primary expositor of the tradition and there are many who are considered Reformed that differ considerably with Calvin. In the end, Muller argues for dropping the label and opting instead of Reformed.

Having dealt with the issue of Calvin’s relation to the tradition that sometimes bears his name, Muller moves on to the question of limited atonement. Any familiar with Calvin’s thought will realize there is not a straightforward answer to whether or not Calvin taught “limited atonement” (the L in TULIP). It turns out that the term “atonement” is not all that helpful to describe Calvin’s thought anyway because he doesn’t use it frequently and especially not in connection with answering the question “what did Christ’s death accomplish?” (or alternately “for whom did Christ die?”). The whole debate illustrates the sticky nature of using later terminology to describe an earlier thinker’s thought. It seems though the way limited atonement is formulated in later Reformed orthodoxy differs somewhat from Calvin’s thought, but not in a particularly radical way. The relationship is still difficult to fully discern.

The remaining essays in the book cover Calvin’s understanding of Ezekiel 18:23 and Amyraut’s confusion over it (chapter 4), Davenant and Du Moulin’s approaches to hypothetical universalism (chapter 5), the development of the Reformed ordo salutis (chapter 6), the relationship of union with Christ and the ordo salutis (chapter 7), and finally “Calvin, Beza,, and the Later Reformed on Assurance of Salvation and the ‘Practical Syllogism’” (chapter 8).

These essays will be very interesting to readers who are already interesting in Reformed theology in general, and it’s historical development in relation to Calvin in particular. Other readers, perhaps not so much. Muller is an excellent historian, and though not a dry writer, does offer up some rather dense passages. The book isn’t an easy read, but neither is it overly difficult. Muller’s thoughts are well organized and each chapter offers an extensive synthesizing conclusion to give readers the gist of what Muller believes he has shown in each study. In the end, anyone interesting in Calvin and Reformed soteriology will likely want to get a copy of this on their shelf.

Book Details

Purchase Info

Buy through Amazon to support Marturo!

ch-7-incarnation_0

Last night, we continued on with Doctrine class. I would give you a PDF of the PPT slide, but here is a link to more or less the same content in blog post form.

In the slides (and post) I mention this book several times and would highly commend it to you on issues related to the doctrine of the incarnation (and the person of Christ and the Trinity):

Beyond that, here are several relevant book reviews I’ve offered on the topic of the person of Christ:

I’ve got quite a bit more when we come to the work of Christ, but in the meantime, here is a helpful video answering the question “Why must the Redeemer be truly human?

Lastly, if you’re interested in an overview of Jesus life and ministry, here is a review series I did last year on N. T. Wright’s Jesus and the Victory of God:

That should do until next week, which we are having class next Sunday, even though we had originally planned not to do so.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...