Archives For Presuppositional Apologetics

I learned my lesson from last year. Instead of 13 books I’m planning to read through, here are 6 books on the larger side that I’m “plodding” through:

Foundations-for-Soul-Care-9780830825677

Foundations of Soul Care: A Christian Psychology Proposal by Eric L. Johnson

9781601781666-9781601780003

A Puritan Theology and Meet the Puritans

11299838

Christian Apologetics: A Comprehensive Case for Biblical Faith by Douglas Groothuis

9780801039317

The New Testament: A Historical and Theological Introduction by Donald Hagner

large OdenClassic

Classic Christianity by Thomas C. Oden

Now, by “plodding” I mean that I intend to slowly read each of these books this year. But, and this is the key, I have no set pace. The goal is to absorb and reflect, not check off that I’ve completed a reading schedule. There is nothing particularly wrong with reading schedules, but I tend to echo Barnabas Piper’s sentiment that it feels kind of like homework.

So, in working my way through these, I’m just picking them up when I feel the urge and reading a chapter, or more, who knows? I’m about 10 chapters into Hagner, 5 into Groothuis, 2 into Beeke’s Puritan Theology, and I’m just cherry picking individuals in Meet the Puritans. As for Foundations of Soul Care, I’ve index surfed a bit and read the opening chapter, and in Classic Christianity (which you should more about here) I’m doing background reading for a doctrine class I’m teaching at church.

None of these are for review, they are all my purchases, believe it or not (but not during the current 90-day book ban, mind you). I may review if you ask really nicely, but you’ll definitely get some book bites as I make my way through.

Hopefully this will all result in a more enjoyable time reading this year, and I think (think) that I’ve learned from some of last year’s mistakes!

9781596383890

Every now and then (twice now in my case) someone else writes a book that as soon I start reading, I wish/feel like I should/could have written it. I had the experience last year with Lit! and had it again this summer with Popologetics. Even without the Chuck Klosterman reference in the introduction, I would have easily been able to tell that author Ted Turnau and I are kindred spirits. This was even further solidified after my post earlier this week on mind styles. Ted sent me a reply on Twitter with his mind style:

And wouldn’t you know it, that’s my mind style as well. It is also the kind myself that would look at pop culture and think, “What else is really going on here?” Not to delve too deeply into Ted’s psychology, but I’m just going to guess this book springs from a question like that.

Overview

The book itself is split into 3 parts. The first grounds in a Christian perspective or worldview. The second looks at several not so helpful approaches to pop cultural interaction from a Christian perspective. Then, the third and final part offers Ted’s constructive proposal that takes on strengths of the previously unhelpful approaches, while trying to avoid their weaknesses.

Ted takes four chapters to fill out the first part of the book. In chapter 1 he introduces the relationship between pop culture and worldview so that in chapter 2 he can explain how the two influence one another. Knowing that, the reader is prepared from Ted’s introduction of worldview apologetics in chapter 3. Part 1 then closes with the lengthiest chapter in the section which uses Reformed biblical theological categories to think about pop culture in general terms all while employing helpful infographics that I might be drawing in class in the near future.

In part 2, Ted turns to 5 different approaches that he finds to be not that helpful in approaching pop culture Christianly. Having thought through how to categorize these kinds of approaches in my own thesis, I wished that Ted’s book had been published last May and then I could have just used his typology. I split everything into two camps: people who love pop culture but have a deficient theological toolbox and people who have a strong theological toolbox but either aren’t interested in pop culture or only interested in being critical. Ted’s is much better and looks like this:

  • Those completely disinterested
  • Those who think it is all dirty and should be avoided
  • Those who treat pop culture as beneath them
  • Those who are obsessed with images
  • Those who think everything is of equal and great value in pop culture

Ted interacts with each of these well and in my opinion, is kind and fair in his critiques. Especially in terms of the latter, I think he did a good job showing that they are on the right track to an extent, but fall short because openly embrace almost everything without any kind of Christian criticism.

Finally, in part 3, Ted offers his own way forward. First he fleshes out his model, which is called “popologetics,” and then he applies his model to several different facets of current pop culture. His model can be broken down into 5 questions:

  • What’s the story?
  • Where am I (the world of the text)?
  • What’s good and true and beautiful about it?
  • What’s false and ugly and perverse about it (and how can I subvert that)?
  • How does the gospel apply here?

When Ted applies these to the different elements of pop culture he offers a short section answering each question so you can kind of get a feel for how it all works. I’ve been thinking through this as well and find that it works to sometimes spend more time on one question or the other depending on the movie/song/tv. show/etc. you’re studying.

Strengths/Weaknesses

After reading the book and thinking about it, it is tempting to present it as all strength. Some of that might be that it is exactly the kind of book I would want to write in fleshing out my thesis. The rest of it is probably because Ted writes well and is engaging and he and I share a mindstyle and for the most part, theological presuppositions when it comes to reading pop culture. Like I said earlier too, I think he handles criticism of other vantage points well and his own model is something that is able to bring out the good in pop culture while not glossing over the bad. In short, his model helps readers learn how to think theologically about pop culture and I am big fan of that.

If I had to highlight one weakness, just to be fair, it would have been great if Ted had included interaction with Craig Detweiler’s (one of the authors who loves just above everything pop culture) most recent book, Into The Dark. Ted notes that he is aware of it and its growth (204), but I would have like to have seen more interaction with it as well as perhaps interaction with Grant Horner’s Meaning at The Movies. That work figured prominently in my thesis, but still did not seem to have the right tools to be critical of pop culture in the way that Ted is able to be.

Conclusion

All that being said, this is a great book and should be widely read by people interested in thinking Christianly about pop culture. Ted presents a great model for engaging pop culture and does so in a way that most people should be able to pick up and apply without too much trouble. As I look at fleshing out my thesis for possible eBook publication, Ted’s work will find its way into my sources and probably strongly influence my re-writing. And, if I end up being able to make the trip to ETS this fall, it will definitely show up my paper presentation. So, if you’re into pop culture, and you’re a Christian, and you like to talk movies, music, tv, etc, you’re probably need this book in your life now.

Book Details

  • Author: Ted Turnau
  • Title: Popologetics: Popular Culture In Christian Perspective
  • Publisher: P&R Publishing (May 7, 2012)
  • Paperback: 368pgs
  • Reading Level: General Reader
  • Audience Appeal: Anyone interested in digging deeper into pop culture from a Christian perspective
  • Amazon
  • Westminster

[You're reading this review of Popologetics because I asked P&R Publishing for a review copy and they said yes!]

9781433513954

[This post is part of the Perspectives on Triperspectivalism series]

Up until this year, I hadn’t really done any kind of lengthy interaction with B. B. Warfield. As much you can envision such a thing, I’ve metaphorically danced around his ideas (go ahead and picture that) but haven’t really read much of his writings.

This was changed first, late last year, when I read and reviewed Right Reason and The Princeton Mind, which had a chapter more or less centered on his approach to theology, which defended him against charges that he overly concerned reason alone when it come to theology.

Now, it is further changing as I’m working through The Theology of B. B. Warfield. On top of that, I also took advantage of Logos FREE Book of the Month, and picked up Volume 1 of his Works: Revelation and Inspiration (which you can also see dovetails into the focus I mentioned yesterday).

All of that is merely to introduce 5 areas that Warfield thought constituted the specific focus of apologetics. For Warfield, apologetics was a kind of “ground clearing” activity that preceded theology and laid the foundation for it. You can see that in his outline of these 5 areas that were indispensable for the apologist to cover (p. 67):

  1. The existence of God as personal being (philosophical apologetics)
  2. Religion, which entails the study of man’s religious sense, philosophy, comparative religions, and the history of religions (psychological apologetics)
  3. Revelation, which entails the establishing of supernaturalism, God’s government of the world and how he has made himself known
  4. Christianity, which entails establishing “the divine origin of Christianity as the religion of revelation in the special sense of that word” (historical apologetics)
  5. Scripture, which seeks to establish the trust-worthiness of the Christian Scriptures as the revelation of God for the redemption of sinners (bibliological apologetics)

I found this helpful in laying exactly what I should focus on as a developing apologist. I may have an opportunity in the next couple of months to teach apologetics to some UCF students as part of an on campus ministry. As I prepare for an adventure like that, I want to think through how I would organize a talk, and looking at Warfield’s areas, I think I’m off to a good start if at least introduce each of those.

But, being the triperspectivalist that I am, I thought Warfield’s 5 areas could possibly be simplified to 3:

  • Theological apologetics (normative)
  • Historical apologetics (situational)
  • Psychological apologetics (existential)

Theological apologetics would combine #1 #3 #5 above, while #2 and #4 can stand alone and be fleshed out further.

Since I know you’re thinking it already, here’s how #1, #3, and #5 make an additional triperpsectival parsing within the normative perspective:

  • Philosophical (normative since it addresses the existence of God)
  • Revelation (situational since it addresses the situation in history of God making himself known)
  • Bibliological (existential since it addresses how persons can trust Scripture and see it addressing existential issues)

I suppose we could probably do the same for the other two areas (historical and psychological) but you get the idea. I think Warfield lays out the task of the apologist nicely, and I think Frame’s perspective helps us organize it.

What do you think?

The first part of my thesis was published by In Antithesis which is ”an online journal focused on the Presuppositional/Covenantal variety of apologetic methodology.”

My thesis is titled Hollywood, Geneva, and Athens: A Reformed Philosophy of Film. I use Calvin’s aesthetics, Van Til’s apologetics, and Frame’s triperspectivalism to sketch out a way of watching movies.

You can check it out here: In Antithesis Vol 2, No. 1.

To get the ball rolling on the reading group idea I mentioned last Friday, we’re reading John Frame’s Apologetics to the Glory of God. Part of this is because it’s a shorter book, and a good introduction to apologetics in a presuppositional vein. The other reason is that we’ll be reading John Frame’s Doctrine of the Knowledge of God in January and this is a good warm-up for that particular book.

Starting this Saturday, we’re discussing chapters 1-2.

I’ll post some thoughts later this week and if you’re interested in joining us, just chime in on the comment section.

Next week we’re skipping ahead just a bit and covering chapter 6-7.

The following week we’ll go back and chapters 3-5.

We’ll use chapter 8 for remote discussion over Christmas break since I don’t think at this point we’ll be meeting up on Christmas eve, but hey, we just might.

The first Saturday in January we’ll start working our way through Frame’s Doctrine of the Knowledge of God and sometime soon I’ll post the schedule for working through that book.

I’ve been thinking through ideas for a name for the group, and finally settled on one. But you’ll have to wait until Friday to get the details on that.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...